Sunday, June 24, 2007

A trip to chinese/japanese garden

A couple of weeks after the start of semester 2, I went to visit chinese and japanese garden. I had not gone to this garden for a long time since young and also I heard that the admission is free. So I decided to pay it a visit. I asked debu and yang guo to come along but they were not interested. Nevertheless, this did not stop me from going there. I had taken some shots as proof. :p No la, I took them because there are nice sceneries. Take a look at these photos and give feedbacks on my photography skills too. :D (The camera I used has only 4.1 Mega pixels.)

Chinese Garden



Japanese Garden



The garden is renovating. Looking forward to visit in its new look. :D

The end.

Rate This Post

Monday, June 18, 2007

中国 used to be called 中邦 used to be called 神州

Interestingly, I found out that China used to be called 神州, meaning God's country or Holy country. [Historical Records 史记 vol 74, Meng Zi Xun Qing]

Links:
1
2
3
4

Recommended book to read:

Faith of Our Fathers - Discovering God in ancient China
(A Review)

Rate This Post

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Snails mating

A day before our last examination period in NTU, KF, JR and I went home quite late together heading towards the bus-stop at communication studies building there. Then we chanced upon a couple - snail - mating by the side of the pathway. As most of the time I brought camera with me to school in case I need it for my FYP, I was able to capture the copulation of the snail.







However, the following photo shows the real copulation:


So, it seems that the couple snails we came across are just at the stage before mating...

Interesting...

Rate This Post

Thursday, June 14, 2007

The Five Love Languages Quiz

Thanks Catherine for sending me this link. :D Yup, I read this book before but never done this quiz. And it really helpful in my future. If only I read the book and my rib doesn't, then it is only me filling the tank ... It should be both sided - it is important that my the other half read this book as well so that we can speak the same language and help each other achieve a common goal in the relationship and also to help build up each other character in the long run ..


1st try:

The Five Love Languages

My primary love language is probably
Physical Touch
with a secondary love language being
Quality Time.

Complete set of results

Physical Touch:
9
Quality Time:
8
Acts of Service:
6
Words of Affirmation:
5
Receiving Gifts:
2


Information

Unhappiness in relationships, according to Dr. Gary Chapman, is often due to the fact that we speak different love languages. Sometimes we don't understand our partner's requirements, or even our own. We all have a "love tank" that needs to be filled in order for us to express love to others, but there are different means by which our tank can be filled, and there are different ways that we can express love to others.

Take the quiz

==============

2nd try:

The Five Love Languages

My primary love language is probably
Quality Time
with a secondary love language being
Physical Touch.

Complete set of results

Quality Time:
10
Physical Touch:
9
Acts of Service:
6
Receiving Gifts:
3
Words of Affirmation:
2


Information

Unhappiness in relationships, according to Dr. Gary Chapman, is often due to the fact that we speak different love languages. Sometimes we don't understand our partner's requirements, or even our own. We all have a "love tank" that needs to be filled in order for us to express love to others, but there are different means by which our tank can be filled, and there are different ways that we can express love to others.

Take the quiz

================

3rd try:

The Five Love Languages

My primary love language is probably
Quality Time
with a secondary love language being
Physical Touch.

Complete set of results

Quality Time:
10
Physical Touch:
7
Acts of Service:
5
Receiving Gifts:
4
Words of Affirmation:
4


Information

Unhappiness in relationships, according to Dr. Gary Chapman, is often due to the fact that we speak different love languages. Sometimes we don't understand our partner's requirements, or even our own. We all have a "love tank" that needs to be filled in order for us to express love to others, but there are different means by which our tank can be filled, and there are different ways that we can express love to others.

Take the quiz

===============

Conclusion from the 3 sets of results in order of importance/priority:

1) Quality time
2) Physical touch
3) Acts of service
4) Receiving gifts
5) Words of affirmation

However, I think receving gifts should be the last one and words of affirmation should be number four.

Before doing the quiz, in the past after reading this book, I thought mine is:

1) Quality time or physical touch
2) Quality time or physical touch
3) Words of affirmation
4) Acts of service
5) Receiving gifts

Rate This Post

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Final Year Project

At first I planned to write what I have learnt during my FYP but I am lazy and not motivated to do so now. Thus, I decided to just put up the image here:



The photo above shows the amount of reading materials (most journals are two pages onto one and double pages while some journals I did not print it out) I had for my FYP!! I doubt the professor has read so much about the topics of my project. =p

Rate This Post

Saturday, June 09, 2007

My wishlist (Things hope to have)

There are some things I wish I could buy after I started working and when I had enough money for them:

- A good, light laptop
- New HP
- A portable external hard disk (2.5 inch, ~ 120-250GB) [Only when required in work]
- A Good digital camera and a higher capacity storage SD card
- A brand new organ (ex man)
- A portable electric piano
- Guitar
- Can't think of any at the moment

Rate This Post

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Intelligent Design Conference (Singapore 21st - 25th May 2007)

On 22 May 2007, I went school to collect my hard bound report and submited whatever things I need to to my professors. There was this NTU e-mail that invited us to a talk on whether if there are any E-T in the universe. I found this topic interesting and so I decided to go and listen to the talk in LT2A at 7.30pm. The speaker was an ang mo and he spoke in such a way that made me didn't understand what he was talking most of the time. Furthermore, I expected some discoveries about traces of E-T but the speaker lectured a lot about theories of the requirements for a habitable planet. I almost Zzzz .... At the end of the lecture, I became aware that the talk was part of the ID conference. So I went home and checked the website given. There were another 2 more talks. I only went to the 24th May as it was a panel discussion, I expected some debates between the audiences and the panels. The venue was in St Andrew Cathedral and this was the first time I went to this cathedral - the underground worship hall - to listen to talks. :D

Not to my suprise, there were indeed some challenging questions from skeptics. As usual, such kind of debates are never ending so it is all up to individual to decide. Overall, the talks by the four experts were interesting and I did gain some knowledge and new thoughts and insights.

There is this powerpoint from the website that can be downloaded. I find it interesting and would like to share with you all. I put it in online storage site in case that website is removed. So here it is:

Is Science compatible with Christianity?

I hope you will learn something that may change your thinking which is mostly taught (or "brainwash") by the world.

Rate This Post

Saturday, May 12, 2007

*̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ *̡͌l̡* 家在远方。。。

*̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ *̡͌l̡* 家在远方。。。

testing...

Rate This Post

Friday, April 13, 2007

What are my objectives in Life ????

*_*?? What are my obectives in life? I am soberly clear that my primary objective in life is to save as many souls as possible (by getting people to know the One True God), serve God and worship God. But I am not actively involve in this most important objective which God required from people who already knows Him. I was rather passive. I was not a good "talker"(but I tried) and I only resort to using e-mailing, blogging and etc to reach out to people.

Although I already know the Eternal God who created heaven and earth, why am I still not that happy and feel lost sometimes. What then is my secondary objective in life? ... I don't know. I don't know the future, I don't know what I'm going to do - I have yet given much thought about it and have not taken any action. I am not sure where God wants me to be in. God, God ... tell me ... where should I be heading. My University life is ending. Tomorrow is my last lecture in my entire University life. What are my secondary objectives in life?

I pray that You would give me some signs or answer and give me courage in my primary objective to walk out of my comfort zone. I may face with many obstacles and struggles in life but with You, You gives me the strength to go on with life. May everything I do, every thoughts of mine, every action of mine, every words I speak ... are pleasing to you. If I didn't, forgive me and guide me back to the right way. I commit my entire life, and my coming examinations and after that, FYP presentation into your hand. Amen.

Rate This Post

Monday, April 09, 2007

Serendipitous or designed (Testimony)

I would like to share with you a testimony that has both touched me and given me insight into how God works. I understand that each faith has its own testimony that convince people to follow a particular belief. Free thinkers and new agers have their own set of testimony that pull people into their own "organized group". Commercial companies have gathered testimonies to convince people of the effectiveness of their products.

Testimony may not always be useful in getting people to believe in God. Some may brush it away as a fanciful tales. Some may think the witnesses are exaggerating and so on...

In Christianity, some people are convinced by testimony. Some people want to see miracles. Some people are convinced by pure reasonings. Some people are because of certains event in their life that caused them to believe. There are many ways in how the Holy Spirit touches the life of individual fellowers and call upon them to believe. The very same ways are also use by the prince of this world to deceive people to stay away from God and His messages to us.

Thus, I believe going by reasonings are the safest. "Let us reason...say the Lord"

Anyway, it is 2 42a.m now. I have no idea in which direction I should write. Anyway, to all truth finders, may you find the right path!! Only God knows before hand who will eventually be saved.

Below are the testimony. It seems that many things are design by God - God plans it. We the observers may see it another way on earth. Well, He is the Author.. Wondering how He is writing mine life story ....

(may improve this post if there is time.)

Rate This Post

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Fail-safe relationship

I have been thinking about the term "fail-safe relationship" recently. Is it possible? Does it exist? Can it exist? I may write about it when I am free and if I feel like writing this topic and know what to write.

Want to know what does it mean by a fail-safe relationship? Stay tune. (but I can't promise I would write about it.)

Rate This Post

Saturday, March 31, 2007

VisualDNA

1st try:




2nd try:




3rd try:



1) 2 x Easy rider; 1 x Dreamer
Comment: I think I'm both. No comment to which is more dominant. :D

2) 2 x Escape Artist; 1 x Thriller
Comment: Depending on situation and mood bah.

3) 1 x High time roller; 1 x New wave puritan; 1 x Back to basic
Comment: In fact I can be any of the 4 characteristics of Habits described. It would be boring to stick to one characteristics. :p

4) 3 x Love bug
Comment: Self-explanatory. Ops. >_<

Rate This Post

Jesus (movie)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6121524153548519701&q=jesus&hl=en

Rate This Post

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Let us reason.......

"Come now, let us reason together," says the LORD. .......... (Isaiah 1:18)

The Creator even invites us to reason with Him to show us that His direction is reasonable and His way is just. Are you able to justify yourself?

Rate This Post

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Of laziness, unmotivated and impatience :(

I am getting more lazy, unmotivated and impatience. I do not want that but help, Lord, tell me what is the next phase in my life. Maybe I am infected with certain virus that only You can remove. I know no matter what, you will get me through this phase into the better life you want me to be. If I am weak, strengthen me.

Rate This Post

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Truth in Deuteronomy

I've never tried to be controversial. The truth is controversial enough. - Keith Green


The eventual silence of God and the use of prophets (human) as God's instrument to speak to us [Here Moses relating to the Israel people what God had told him]:
14 The nations you will dispossess listen to those who practice sorcery or divination. But as for you, the LORD your God has not permitted you to do so. 15 The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers. You must listen to him. 16 For this is what you asked of the LORD your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, "Let us not hear the voice of the LORD our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die."

17 The LORD said to me: "What they say is good. 18 I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him. 19 If anyone does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name, I myself will call him to account. 20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, must be put to death."

21 You may say to yourselves, "How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD ?" 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him.
(Deuteronomy 18: 14-22)


Yes, fortune telling, palm reading, other divination ways can be real and exist. Things (not from God) associate with the spiritual world do exist:
1 If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, 2 and if the sign or wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, "Let us follow other gods" (gods you have not known) "and let us worship them," 3 you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The LORD your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. 4 It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him.
(Deuteronomy 13:1-4)


God spoken to Moses, reaffirming in these verses that the whole earth belongs to Him. Who else have the guts to say such a things?
5 Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession. Although the whole earth is mine, 6 you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.' These are the words you are to speak to the Israelites."
(Exodus 19:5-6)



Moses spoken to the Israel community
14 To the LORD your God belong the heavens, even the highest heavens, the earth and everything in it.
(Deuteronomy 10:14)


Hmmm.... Why isn't China His chosen nation? There are many scholars there leh... China so big, so many people leh... hmmm... :) ) [Israel started as a very small group of people, raised by God, into now a powerful nation. He always use the foolish things - small and depised by us - for His big plan. Although plan I - to use Israel to attract all the other nations to Israel as His kingdom - fails because of Israel "hardness", we are now under plan II. Israel to be dealt with later.]
6 For you are a people holy to the LORD your God. The LORD your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.
(Deuteronomy 7:6)


From the very ancient to the very present, the nature is very much worshipped. In these verses, God was speaking to the Israel community.
15
You saw no form of any kind the day the LORD spoke to you at Horeb out of the fire. Therefore watch yourselves very carefully, 16 so that you do not become corrupt and make for yourselves an idol, an image of any shape, whether formed like a man or a woman, 17 or like any animal on earth or any bird that flies in the air, 18 or like any creature that moves along the ground or any fish in the waters below. 19 And when you look up to the sky and see the sun, the moon and the stars—all the heavenly array—do not be enticed into bowing down to them and worshiping things the LORD your God has apportioned to all the nations under heaven. 20 But as for you, the LORD took you and brought you out of the iron-smelting furnace, out of Egypt, to be the people of his inheritance, as you now are.
(Deuteronomy 4: 15-20)

Rate This Post

Still reading the Old Testament

I have been reading the old testament part and have not touched the new testament part for quite a long time except during sermon. My goodness, my mind is tuned to the old testament time frame. Now only manage half way through deuteronomy. Still a long way before I complete the old testament. Haiz... May God guide me through finishing reading the whole bible. Amen.

Rate This Post

Sunday, January 07, 2007

孙中山无再生希望时恳切祈祷


For those who want to know more about Dr Sun Yat-sen, read above.

For full wordings letter from Dr Sun Yat-sen:

弟被誘擒於倫敦,牢於清使館,十有餘日,擬將弟捆綁乘夜下船,私運出境。初六、七日內,無人知覺,弟身在牢中,自分必死。此時唯有痛心懺悔,懇切祈禱而 已。一連六七日,日夜不絕祈禱,愈祈愈切,至第七日,心中忽然安慰,全無憂色,不期然而然,自云此祈禱有應,蒙神施恩矣。但日夜三四人看守,窗戶俱閉,嚴 密異常,惟有洋役二人。前已托之傳書,已為所賣,將書交與衙內之人,密事俱俾知之,防範更為加密!而可為傳消息者,終必賴其人,今蒙上帝施恩,接我祈禱, 使我安慰,當必能感動其人,使肯為我傳書。簡地利(Dr James Cantlie, Sun's teacher) 萬臣(Dr Patrick Manson, Sun's teacher)兩師,他等一聞此事,著力異常,即報捕房,即稟外部,初時尚無人信,捕房以此二人為癲狂者,使館全推並無其事,初報館亦不甚信,迨後彼二 人力證其事之不誣,報館始為傳揚,而全國震動,歐洲震動,天下各國亦然。沙侯行文著即釋放,不然即將使臣人等逐出英境。此十餘日間,使館與北京電報來往不 絕,我數十斤肉,任彼千方百計而謀耳。幸天心有意,人謀不藏,雖清勇陰謀,終無我何。弟遭此大故,如浪子還家,亡羊復獲,此皆天父大恩。敬望先生進之以道,常賜教言,俾從神道而入治道,則弟幸甚,蒼生幸甚!”

Extracted from: http://www.chinese-forums.com/showthread.php?t=14725

Rate This Post

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

About offerings and tithing

For goodness sake, if you don't understand what offerings and tithing is all about, please don't give offerings and tithing. God loves a cheerful giver. Thank you. :D

Oh for goodness sake, if you don't know what offerings and tithing is all about, please don't kpkb. Go find out before you kpkb. - To people outside of church :D:D

If a particular church or ministry abuses what God has established, then leave it to God to deal with them in His time lo.

Rate This Post

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Ponderisms

Found the "Ponderisms" in a forum. Feel that it is quite meaningful so decide to share it with whoever is reading my blog:


PONDERISMS


* I used to eat a lot of natural foods until I learned that most people die of natural causes.

* Gardening Rule: When weeding, the best way to make sure you are removing a weed and not a valuable plant is to pull on it. If it comes out of the ground easily, it is a valuable plant.

* The easiest way to find something lost around the house is to buy a replacement.

* Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

* There are two kinds of pedestrians: the quick and the dead.

* Life is sexually transmitted.

* Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

* The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth.

* Some people are like Slinkies. Not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.

* Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing.

* Have you noticed since everyone has a camcorder these days no one talks about seeing UFOs like they used to?

* Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.

* All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.

* In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.

* Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.

* How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?

* Who was the first person to look at a cow and say, "I think I'll squeeze these dangly things here, and drink whatever comes out?"

* Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there? I'm gonna eat the next thing that comes outta its butt."

* Why is there a light in the fridge and not in the freezer?

* If Jimmy cracks corn and no one cares, why is there a song about him?

* Why does Goofy stand erect while Pluto remains on all fours? They're both dogs!

* If Wile E. Coyote had enough money to buy all that Acme crap, why didn't he just buy dinner?

* If corn oil is made from corn, and vegetable oil is made from vegetables, then what is baby oil made from?

* If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

* Why do the Alphabet song and Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star have the same tune?

* Do illiterate people get the full effect of Alphabet Soup?

* Did you ever notice that when you blow in a dog's face, he gets mad at you, but when you take him on a car ride, he sticks his head out the window?

* Does pushing the elevator button more than once make it arrive faster?

* Why doesn't glue stick to the inside of the bottle?

Rate This Post

Monday, December 25, 2006

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Biting My Tongue

This article is about speaking in tongue. For those interested in this issue can read the article below:



http://graceatwork.org/view.php3?Id=350

When I was interviewed for the position of pastor of First
Baptist Church, I had to answer one key question: "Do you
speak in tongues?"
The church had been split by the charismatic
controversy. They had to know.
My answer then and my answer now is this:"What you need to
know is my theology on the matter. That is more critical
then whether I have this gift."

I have not revisited this topic for some time. In the twenty
odd years since that interview many of the churches I know
have moved beyond that controversy and that divide. There
has been a lot of maturing all round. Although different
churches still have different views on the subject there is
a much higher level of mutual respect and a lot of healthy
learning between different traditions. (I am grateful for
the many friends I have from Pentecostal and charismatic
traditions. I am grateful for their friendship and the
opportunities we have for working together.)

But once in a while you get "deja vu all over again" and you
get a speaker or a group that pushes the classical
Pentecostal position on tongues, tongues here understood as
an unknown language, sounds uttered in prayer unintelligible
to the one praying and to others (1 Corinthians 14:2).

Usually the agenda is the desire to see the release of God's
supernatural power. This is something seen as happening in a
believer's life separate from conversion, an event often
referred to as the baptism of the Spirit. As evidence that
this release had taken place, one was given the gift of
tongues. Tongues became something very critical because it
was identified with spiritual empowerment which is the real
goal.

So what is my take on this?

First off I am very grateful to my Pentecostal and
charismatic friends for reminding us of the need for the
Holy Spirit's power. Luke summarizes Jesus's ministry in
this way: "...with respect to Jesus from Nazareth, that God
anointed him with the Holy Spirit and with power. He went
around doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the
devil, because God was with him." (Acts 10:38 NET)
The link between supernatural power, the Holy Spirit and
the ability to do God's work is clear. And Jesus is the
model for His church.

Too often the modern church has put her trust in techniques,
technology and good marketing to get God's job done,
basically paying lip service to the need for the Spirit's
anointing. We welcome every reminder that while we should
appreciate all tools the Lord gives us, our ultimate trust
is in Him and in His empowerment.

But what is the linkage between spiritual anointing and the
gift of tongues? Is tongues something that everyone should
be seeking as the sign of God's empowerment?

My starting point is 1 Corinthians 12: 29-30

"Not all are apostles, are they? Not all are prophets, are
they? Not all are teachers, are they? Not all perform
miracles, do they? Not all have gifts of healing, do they?
Not all speak in tongues, do they? Not all interpret, do
they?" (NET)

There is no ambiguity in the Greek. Paul is asking a
rhetorical question that demands the answer "no". No,
tongues is not for everyone.

Remember that Paul is writing to a church that included a
faction that was pushing for more dramatic manifestations of
the Spirit including the gift of tongues. This was a group
who probably saw themselves as spiritual elites who wanted
others to join them and apparently one of the marks that you
had reached their level of anointing was the exercise of the
gift of tongues.
Paul is clear. No, not everyone has this gift. Indeed it is
the Lord who decides who gets what gift. (1 Corinthians
12:11).

But Paul is not against the gift of tongues. He admits to
exercising the gift frequently in his private prayers. But
he is also clear that his preference is that intelligible
language be used when the church gathers so that believers
can be edified.

"I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you,
but in the church I want to speak five words with my mind to
instruct others, rather than ten thousand words in a
tongue." (1 Corinthians 14:18-19 NET).

There are those who argue that there is a "sign of tongues"
which is to be differentiated from the "gift of tongues." At
Pentecost one of the signs that the Spirit had come was
tongues. And everyone ought to seek this "sign of tongues"
as evidence for the Spirit's anointing though not all will
be given the "gift of tongues."

I do not see this differentiation in Scripture.
The word "tongues" is the same both in Acts 2 and in 1
Corinthians. And if one were to push for the signs at
Pentecost should we not also push for the sound of a violent
wind and the tongues of fire?

Therefore I am not convinced that the gift of tongues is the
indispensable sign of God's empowerment or that all
Christians should strive to get it. And I am against any
sort of elitism in the church. There are no second class
Christians at the Lord's table.

But I am convinced that we desperately need the empowerment
of the Spirit for the life and mission of the church. How
then do we appropriate God's power for His purposes? For my
answer I go to Acts 4: 23-31.

Here we find a church totally sold out to God and His
purposes. Initial success in mission work had provoked
persecution. God's power was critically needed for a breakthrough. And so the group joined in corporate prayer beseeching the Lord to intervene and work His power with the following results:

"When they had prayed, the place where they were assembled
together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy
Spirit and began to speak the word of God courageously."
(4:31 NET)

Yes there was accompanying physical phenomenon - the place
was shaken - and the Lord does that sometimes, but the key
words are "prayed," "filled with the Holy Spirit," and
"began to speak the word of God courageously."

When we focus on the phenomena of tongues we often get tied
up into all sorts of controversy that take us away from the
heart of the issue.
Instead of pushing tongues we should be searching our hearts
and asking, are we are indeed sold out to God and His
purposes? Are we really aware of our total helplessness to
do His work apart from His anointing?

Whatever our stand on the gift of the tongues, and every
church needs to define their position, we must major on
the majors.
Come O Lord and fill us again.

Your brother,
Soo-Inn Tan

Rate This Post

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Should Christians Convert Others?

I find this article interesting . . .




Should Christians Convert Others?
by Tan Soo-Inn, 25 Jul 2003

http://graceatwork.org/view.php3?Id=174
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It was quite jarring to walk into bookstores in Malaysia to be confronted with the cover of the June, 30th issue of TIME magazine. The headline screamed: "Should Christians Convert Muslims?" Fact is, there are state laws in Malaysia that penalizes anyone caught "enticing" a Muslim to leave his or her faith. Therefore the issue of how Christians should reach the Muslim community for Christ is one that is hardly discussed in public in Malaysia.

My first response to the headline was "I would frame the question differently." The Scriptures teach quite clearly that conversion is the work of the Holy Spirit i.e. God's own Spirit (John 16:8-11). A Christian may share the truths of the gospel, she may appeal to people to embrace the truth of the gospel, but he cannot convert anyone.

Indeed the church of Christ has often gotten into trouble when she crosses the boundary and tries to do the work of the Holy Spirit, "helping" people to convert through the use of military or governmental powers, or enticing people to Christ through the giving of aid in times of need.

(I quickly need to qualify that Christians are called to show compassion to all in need, giving with a free hand, giving unconditionally. This indirectly reveals the heart of Christ. But we cannot ever imply that to receive help, one must first embrace Christianity.)

No, we cannot convert anyone. Nevertheless, there are certain truths in the Scriptures that are clear. Two of them are:

1. Jesus is the only solution to the root problem of humankind - sin. "There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among mortals by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12 NRSV

2. Followers of Jesus are called to bring this message to all races and communities. "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age." Matthew 28:19-20

The irony is that Islam and Christianity share a number of things in common. One of them is a common adherence to the concept of objective and absolute truth. Standing against the post modern mood of many truths for many people, Islam and Christianity would say that if Islam or Christianity were true, then other answers to the fundamental questions of humankind --- "where did we come from", "why are we what we are", "what is the ultimate solution for humankind's problems"---are wrong.

The temptation for Christians and Muslims alike, is to jettison our commitment to absolute truth. We are told to "play nice" and live and let live. Any position that takes truth as absolute will lead to fanaticism and violence. After all, the modern world is a pluralistic world of many faiths. Let every faith community do their own thing but don't try to "convert" others. This position is appealing because there many conflicts around the world that appear to be rooted in religious differences.

Unfortunately any backing away from a commitment to absolute truth undercuts the very basis of the truth of the Christian gospel. If Christianity is not true for all it is not true at all. Why should God come as man and to die on the cross if there was any other way? I am always amused when I hear people say that all religions are essentially the same. Such people betray the fact that they have not studied religions with any degree of depth.

Of course no one wants intercommunal violence. What this means for Christians is that we must take a long hard look at how we share the gospel. I am particularly partial to Leslie Newbigin's suggestion that the lives of Christians must be so different that we arouse the curiosity of those outside the faith. (See for example his "The Gospel In A Pluralist Society.") And when they ask why we are different, then we answer with the gospel. For example, I recall the enemies of Christ having to acknowledge "how they love one another" when they looked at the early Christian communities. I wonder if they would say the same today.

The whole question of Christian-Muslim relationships is a big and complex one. I speak to those within the Christian community. We follow a crucified Christ and have been specifically warned that his followers would suffer the same fate (2 Timothy 3:12). Suffering is intertwined deep in the Christian DNA. We must never kill for Christ (Matthew 26:47-56). But we must always be ready to suffer and die for Him.

Before we even think of such heroic possibilities, we must first ask: What is the quality of our life in Christ? Do Christians and churches reflect so jarringly the love and holiness of God that people pause to look and ask questions? Or are we qualitatively no different from those who do not follow Christ? If there is no real difference, then there really is nothing for people to "convert" to is there?

Your brother, Soo-Inn Tan

Rate This Post

Friday, November 17, 2006

About the resurrection of Jesus Christ

The late jurisprudential prodigy and international statesman Sir Lionel Luckhoo (of The Guinness Book of World Records fame for his unprecedented 245 consecutive defense murder trial acquittals) epitomized Christian enthusiasm and confidence in the strength of the case for the resurrection when he wrote, “I have spent more than 42 years as a defense trial lawyer appearing in many parts of the world and am still in active practice. I have been fortunate to secure a number of successes in jury trials and I say unequivocally the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”

Reference:
Sir Lionel Luckhoo, The Question Answered: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Luckhoo Booklets, back page. http://www.hawaiichristiansonline.com/sir_lionel.html.

Rate This Post

Saturday, November 11, 2006

National Healing Campaign?



Why does this person call himself prophet? Are we going to realise Matthew 24 soon? Will it be in my times? Maybe in our children's times? Don't know la. Just trust and obey. There is no other way. I need to let go and let God, sometimes . . .

Rate This Post

Friday, November 03, 2006

ECUSA's Incoming Leader: Homosexuality Not a Choice, Jesus Not the Only Way

ECUSA's Incoming Leader: Homosexuality Not a Choice, Jesus Not the Only Way
Comments by Jefferts-Schori During Interview Appear to Contradict Scripture

By Jody Brown and Allie Martin
November 2, 2006

(AgapePress) - She says she doesn't consider Jesus Christ to be the only way to God. She says she believes God makes some people "gay." And she's soon to be the leader of a mainline Protestant denomination in America.

In his letter to the Colossians, the Apostle Paul writes that "in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form" (Col. 2:9, NIV). But in an interview this week with Associated Press, Bishop Katharine Jefferts-Schori -- who is to be installed on Saturday as the first female presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church USA -- stated that Christians should not say that Jesus is the only way to God. "If we insist we know the one way to God," she said, "we've put God in a very small box."

In John 14:6, Jesus -- in responding to a question posed by the disciple Thomas -- said: "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me." But Jefferts-Schori says she disagrees with the idea that salvation comes only through trusting in Jesus Christ. "It's this sense that one person can have the fullness of truth in him or herself, rather than understanding that truth is -- like God -- more than any one person can encompass," stated the soon-to-be ECUSA leader.

Jefferts-Schori says she views salvation as the healing of all Creation through holy living. "I understand salvation as being about the healing of the whole creation. Your part and my part in that is about holy living," she offered. "As Christians we understand [salvation] as relationship with God in Jesus, but that does not mean that we're expected to judge other people's own commitments."

Where does she stand on the issue of homosexuality? The Episcopal Church has been embroiled for years in a debate over the ordination of homosexual clergy and "blessing" ceremonies for same-sex couples. Jefferts-Schori supports both -- and in fact, she voted in 2003 to confirm her denomination's first openly homosexual bishop, V. Gene Robinson. She told AP that she does not believe the Bible condemns "committed" homosexual relationships. God, she says, made some people "gay."

"Sexual orientation is pretty clearly defined at a very early age, before the age of reason. It's not a choice," she said. "In that case, a person of faith would need to say that it's a piece of how one is created." Consequently, she says, the Church should offer what she calls "a sacramental container" to help homosexuals find "holy ways of living in relationship."

Scriptures in the Bible about homosexual acts being sinful, she says, are misunderstood. "They're not about what today we see as mature human beings entering into committed relationships with each other on a full and equal basis," says Jefferts-Schori, who believes such "committed" relationships can be blessed. "The religious community's job, really, is to help all human beings find healthy and whole and holy ways of living in relationship."

Run, Don't Walk
Canon David Anderson is president of the American Anglican Council, a group of conservative clergy and lay people from the Episcopal Church. Anderson says he's not surprised at the recent comments by Jefferts-Schori, and offers what he sees as the only option for those still in churches aligned with ECUSA.

"I think they need to run, not walk, to the exit and find an orthodox Episcopal church," suggests Anderson.

According to Anderson, the Episcopal Church cast off biblical beliefs long ago in favor of postmodernism. Jefferts-Schori's comments, he claims, is merely in harmony with that. "Her remarks with regard to the plurality of ways to God are consistent both with what she has said before and with what the top level of leadership in the Episcopal Church has been saying now for probably a decade," says Anderson.

Associated Press reports that eight Episcopal dioceses have asked Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who heads the world Anglican Communion, to put them under a leader other than Bishop Jefferts-Schori. But the Episcopal Diocese of Dallas says it is not one of those dioceses asking Williams to appoint a conservative national leader to oversee them.

Dallas Bishop James Stanton said in a statement earlier this week that he still disagrees with the direction of the Episcopal Church, but that the language in the request from the other dioceses rejecting incoming Jefferts-Schori and seeking an alternate leader had "caused confusion and some anxiety" in his diocese.


More and more signs.....

Episcopalians install female leader

By RACHEL ZOLL, AP Religion WriterSat Nov 4, 3:40 PM ET

Katharine Jefferts Schori took office Saturday as the first female leader of The Episcopal Church and the first woman priest to head an Anglican province, two landmarks that could quickly be overshadowed by divisions over the Bible and sexuality throughout world Anglicanism.

Jefferts Schori, who supports ordaining gays, acknowledged the rift in an elaborate ceremony at the Washington National Cathedral, urging parishioners to "make peace" with those who oppose the direction of the U.S. church. In 2003, the denomination consecrated its first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.

"If some in this church feel wounded by recent decisions, then our salvation, our health as a body, is at some hazard, and it becomes the duty of all of us to seek healing and wholeness," Jefferts Schori said during her ceremony.

Jefferts Schori, 52, was bishop of Nevada when she was the surprise winner of the election for presiding bishop at the Episcopal General Convention in June. A former oceanographer who was ordained in 1994, she had served only about five years as a bishop.

Her election was celebrated as a victory for woman clergy and for Episcopalians who support full inclusion of gays and lesbians in the 2.3 million-member denomination. It was decried by U.S. traditionalists and many Anglicans overseas who do not want to recognize Jefferts Schori's leadership.

More than 3,000 people filled the church to welcome the new presiding bishop.

Worshippers stood and faced the doors of the cathedral as Jefferts Schori knocked and entered, wearing a multicolored robe and miter. She walked in a procession toward the front of the church, led by people waving streamers and flags, as applause and music filled the sanctuary.

Outgoing Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold, who just completed his nine-year term, turned over the symbol of authority, the primatial staff, and Jefferts Schori stood beaming at the altar as onlookers cheered. She received blessings in Hebrew from a rabbi, in Arabic from a Muslim scholar, along with receiving prayers in several other languages.

Jefferts Schori hopes to revitalize Episcopal parishes after years of declining membership, and to advance the church's fight against poverty and other social ills at home and abroad. She urged Episcopalians on Saturday to work for "shalom" — the Hebrew word for peace — by working to heal the world's suffering.

But internal conflicts are likely to consume much of her time.

She will now represent the American denomination to the Anglican world. Her job is complicated by her personal support for Robinson's election and for blessing same-sex couples, though she insists she won't impose her views on others. She said the U.S. church should be willing to compromise "for a season" to stay in the 77 million-member Anglican Communion.

That may not be enough to appease other branches of the Anglican family, which take a traditional view that gay relationships are prohibited by Scripture. Some Anglican leaders also reject the idea of women's ordination: Jefferts Schori has said they'll have to "get over it."

The majority of Anglicans worldwide have conservative views on sexuality, but they are a minority in The Episcopal Church. Still, by withholding money and building alliances with like-minded Anglicans overseas, they have chipped away at the authority of the denomination.

Seven U.S. conservative dioceses have already rejected Jefferts Schori and have asked Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the Anglican spiritual leader, to assign them another national leader. Three of the dioceses do not support ordaining women.

Jefferts Schori has spent her life tackling challenges.

Along with her past career as a scientist, she is a rock climber and a pilot who flew her plane to visit parishes around the sprawling Nevada Diocese.

Her husband of more than 25 years, Richard Schori, is a retired mathematician. Their daughter, 25-year-old Katharine Johanna, is a pilot in the U.S. Air Force.

Jefferts Schori decided to pursue full-time ministry after federal funding for her scientific research dried up.

___

On the Net:

The Episcopal Church: http://www.episcopalchurch.org


Oh dear, oh dear, we are approaching towards the end of human history le.

Rate This Post

Sunday, October 22, 2006

The word "God"

I have been thinking why whenever the word "God" is mentioned, non-believer would usually feel annoyed or irritated by it. I have come to believe that this is because they believe that if God exists, He will help to solve all the problems and messes in this world, and their own problems. If God exists, they would see the glory of God with their own eyes. But, to them, none happens and so to them either God is dead or God is a man-made notion to explain the purpose of everything. This is similar to the story of the boy "crying wolf is coming" three times.

However, the bible gives us the assurance that suffering is inevitable in this present world, not until the old rule of system will give way to the new rule of system in future. There is something which I still have not understood: that is God's overall plan - why does He allows suffering to happen and why does He wants to use suffering to build us up for the better. Is there really no other way?

The bible also tells us that we will not see God until we breath our last and definitely in the eternal future. A parable tells us that the Master was away for a long journey, leaving his servants at his house. The Master will return unexpectedly, punishing the servants who are "fooling around" and rewarding servants who are obedience.

There are greater reason to believe in God and His plan. Yes, His plan is in progress and we can be impatient at times. Around 2000 years have passed since the "last hour" kicks in.

I can understand why non-believers find it hard to believe in a Creator but His word left in the bible gives us the confidence that there is a God. I really hope they would spend some time to study the bible. The bible, on the whole, is difficult to refute, otherwise the faith will not withstand for so long. So our enemies wanted to deceive the world that the bible is corrupted and not worth believing and so on. Well, if one care to put in effort to study and understand the whole picture, one would find it hard to deny the word in the bible. The choice is yours.

Rate This Post

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Nationwide Church Attendance In The United States Less Than Half Of Previous Estimates

Surprising Stats in New Church Research
Nationwide Church Attendance In The United States Less Than Half Of Previous Estimates

By Dan Wooding
Founder of ASSIST Ministries

ST LOUIS, MO (ANS) -- Attendance at American churches is less than half of what we have believed in the past, according to Dave Olson, director of church planting for the Evangelical Covenant Church, and director of the American Church Research Project.

According to a news release from Mission America Coalition, Olson addressed the Mission America Coalition annual conference on its closing day with groundbreaking new research about the state of the American church. Instead of relying on limited survey data which is then extrapolated to the entire population, Olson has worked for years to build a database of actual recorded attendance in over 300,000 churches across America.

His vision was to present a much more accurate picture of what is really happening to the American church at both the national and local levels, and with information refined down to individual zip codes.

“I'm not relying on what people say, I'm measuring their actual behavior,” he told nearly 170 national church, ministry, and lay leaders gathered.

The released continued, “According to Olson's research, overall church attendance is virtually unchanged from 15 years ago, even though the United States population has grown by 52 million people -- mostly unchurched. The northeast U.S. is the only region where the church is growing faster than the population, and no state has seen a net increase in the percentage of church attendance in the last five years. Even in the southern states, the traditional Bible Belt, the population is growing faster than the church.”

Jim Overholt, executive director of the Coalition said, “Having information about actual attendance at churches in individual communities is a significant leap forward by itself, but even more important is that we can now overlay the church data with census and other demographic information to tell us more about the dynamics of change within income, education, and other key sociological indicators that are also available by zip code.”

Olson's research revealed a number of surprising and often counter-intuitive statistics. For example: the evangelical church is growing fastest among the higher income, college-educated, suburban population, and declining fastest among the least educated, and in areas with the highest poverty rates.

“The evangelical church is becoming suburban, affluent, and educated,” Olson said.

“We live in a world today that is post-Christian, post-modern and multi-ethnic, whether we realize it or not,” he added. To reach this “new world” with the gospel, the church needs to change, he told the leaders gathered, echoing one of the key elements in the Coalition’s new initiative, Calling God’s People Together to Love Our Communities to Christ.

“The church needs to have an attitude of brokenness, humility, and repentance,” he said, admonishing that as evangelical Christians we tend to have an attitude of triumph--that we are right and the world should live like us. That attitude will keep us from reaching the lost for Christ, he said. He emphasized that the world simply acts the way it is supposed to -- as unbelievers. “This is the way it's always been, this is the way it's described in the Bible. The problem is that the church has not been acting like the church.”

“The Christian community needs a restoration of its understanding of the message and mission of Jesus. It needs to be less self-righteous, individualistic, and materialistic. It needs to be more biblical, Christo-centric, and holistic.” He said that when the Church talks about Jesus, it often does so in a second-hand way. “In a Christian world we can get away with that,” he says. But not in the emerging 21st century culture.

Olson's data and presentation to the Mission American Coalition annual meeting will be available to access online as of Oct. 17 at: www.theamericanchurch.org.

The Mission America Coalition is a network of national church leaders, representing denominations, ministries, and other key Christian leaders with a shared vision to collaborate in prayer, evangelism, and revival. Since its inception, leaders from 81 denominations, over 400 ministries and dozens of ministry networks have been involved in the Coalition. Mrs. Vonette Bright (Campus Crusade for Christ), Dr. Billy Graham (Billy Graham Evangelistic Association), and Dr. John Perkins (Christian Community Development Association) serve as honorary co-chairs.

For more information about Mission America Coalition or the “Loving Our Communities to Christ” initiative, www.missionamerica.org.


Errr....... really coming le la.... when it really comes, everything will kick off very fast .....

Rate This Post

Monday, October 09, 2006

'In 20 years, there will be no more Christians in Iraq'


'In 20 years, there will be no more Christians in Iraq'


Three years after the invasion of Iraq, it is believed that half the Christians in the country have fled, driven out by bomb attacks, assassinations and death threats. So why haven't the coalition forces done more to protect them? Mark Lattimer reports

Friday October 6, 2006
The Guardian

Three members of his family had already been murdered before Shamon Isaac decided to leave Baghdad. First, his son-in-law Raid Khalil was shot dead in January 2005 as he fled gunmen who had tried to pull him and his father into a minibus. Like many Christians, Khalil had received a death threat signed by the Islamic Army in Iraq. He left behind a widow and a baby girl, who is now nearly two.

Four weeks after Khalil was killed, Isaac's brother was stopped at a checkpoint by seven men in Iraqi army uniforms as he was on his way to collect passports to take his own family out of the country. "People in the neighbourhood shouted to his daughter that her father had been assassinated," Isaac said, "and she came out and found his body in the street." Then last August Isaac's brother-in-law was shot dead in his shop by three gunmen.

Finally Isaac and his family had no choice. When in January this year cars started to circle the family home in al-Dora with men shooting in the air, they escaped to another Baghdad neighbourhood, al-Jediya. But major demonstrations were taking place throughout the Muslim world in response to the Danish cartoons and on January 29 bombs ripped through seven churches in Baghdad, Mosul and Kirkuk, killing 16. Then one day a man walked into the small shop that the family had just opened next to their new home, bought some cigarettes and walked out, but not before he had left a letter on the counter. On opening it, they found it contained a single word: "Blood."

The mechanisms of terror in the new Iraq have uprooted families from every community, including Sunni and Shia, Arab and Kurd. But although Christians made up less than four per cent of the population - fewer than one million people - they formed the largest groups of new refugees arriving in Jordan's capital Amman in the first quarter of 2006, according to an unpublished report by the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). In Syria, which has a longer border with Iraq, 44% of Iraqi asylum-seekers were recorded as Christian since UNHCR began registrations in December 2003, with new registrations hitting a high early this year. Fleeing killings, kidnappings and death threats, they come from Baghdad, from Basra in the zone of British control and, disproportionately, from Mosul in the north. The Catholic bishop of Baghdad, Andreos Abouna, was quoted recently as saying that half of all Iraqi Christians have fled the country since the 2003 US-led invasion.

Yet their exodus has gone largely unreported, despite the fact that both George Bush and Tony Blair have spoken about how their own Christian beliefs have informed their policies in Iraq. In one of his first speeches after 9/11, the US president described the fight against terrorism as a "crusade", a characterisation that he wisely dropped but which is habitually repeated by critics of US foreign policy, including al-Qaida and other insurgent groups in Iraq. Many Christians have been accused of association with the multinational force, or of supporting the west. Now Iraqi Christian leaders are bitter that the west has done so little to protect them.

When Isaac fled Baghdad with 11 of his family it was, naturally enough, to the ancient home of Iraqi Christianity that they came - to the plains of Nineveh. I met them there three weeks later, huddled in a room in Bartallah, outside Mosul, part of the great fertile flatland on the banks of the Tigris where nearly every village has its church, and each church now has an armed guard. The plains are among the longest continually habited places on earth. It was to save Nineveh that the Biblical God delivered up Jonah from the belly of the whale, and the Assyrian Christians here still speak Syriac, a dialect of Aramaic, the language Jesus Christ spoke with his apostles.

But Nineveh's unique place in Christian heritage counts for little today beside its strategic value in the geo-ethnic endgame of the Iraqi conflict. Situated between Iraqi Kurdistan and the insurgent strongholds west of Mosul, the Nineveh plains are central to the security of both, and to the territorial ambitions of Kurds and Sunni Arabs alike. Travelling in Iraq as part of a human rights mission coordinated by the charity Minority Rights Group International, in association with the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (Unami), I was told that no aid workers had been able to operate here since May 2004, when four Americans from a Baptist charity were killed in an ambush on the Mosul-Erbil road.

In Mosul city, both the Ba'athists and the Islamist groups had deep bases of support that enabled them to control whole neighbourhoods and, periodically, the city's police. "They stopped a Christian woman from Mosul university, took her away and cut off her head," the manager of a women's welfare organisation told me, her face flushed with the imagining of it. "They said that if anyone comes to college without hijab, they will be killed."

"The poor security situation covers all communities in the city," explained Dr Yousef Lalo, the assistant governor of Mosul. "But as a minority, the Christians are particularly vulnerable. They are also often more affluent than other communities, so people try to extract money from them." A former psychology lecturer, Lalo's habitual companions are no longer students but the bodyguards that testify to his status as the only remaining Christian in the city's senior administration.

"Many churches were bombed in 2004 and 2005 but the multinational force and the Iraqi national army did not find out who was responsible; they didn't even do a proper investigation. It got worse and few people turned up even for Christmas and Easter celebrations. Now the Christians protect their own churches."

Lalo couldn't provide a number for how many Christians had left Mosul, but said that "thousands" had emigrated to Jordan, Syria and Turkey. "Half the Christians in Mosul have left since 2003 and the rest are planning to leave if they can. Many of my family have emigrated to Australia and Sweden and become refugees."

But this softly spoken professor was staying to fight. "This is my land, and the land of my father and grandfathers, and I will not leave. I have also forbidden my three sons to emigrate."

That morning, Lalo had his first meeting with the multinational force commander for Mosul and eastern Nineveh, Colonel Michael Shields. Although "meeting" is perhaps not quite the right word for an encounter that began when four US soldiers in full battle dress came through the front door unannounced, the commander demanding: "Who's the leader? Where's the leader?" But once the Americans had put down their weapons and body armour, the exchange that followed was polite enough. I knew Lalo was bitter that the US had supported the appointment of a Muslim mayor in a predominantly Christian area and Shields told me he was working hard to improve contacts with local officials. He explained: "Nineveh province is an ethnically challenging area. If the governor shows favouritism, that creates problems." Lalo ventured bluntly that Shields' predecessor had been "bad for the Christians". "That," the colonel said, "is water under the bridge."

The Christians' last hope in Iraq may just lie, according to Lalo, with Sarkis Aghajan, minister of finance in the Kurdistan regional government and, until last May, Kurdish deputy prime minister. It is he who has been channelling money to Nineveh to pay for armed guards.

In his palatial residence in Ankawa, a Christian neighbourhood in Iraqi Kurdistan, he talked about his community as he sat between a picture of the crucifixion and the statue of an eagle. "As Christians," he said in Syriac, "we regard Nineveh as our region. Throughout history our people have been obliged to leave and live elsewhere." This included those who had fled Saddam Hussein's campaign to "Arabise" Kurdish and Christian areas in the north, when land was redistributed by force to Arab settlers. But now, he explained, about 3,500 families had come from Mosul and Baghdad to settle in the Nineveh plains.

"More than 30 Christian villages have been restored. But people will not return unless they feel their national rights are protected. Before, people were kidnapped on a daily basis. We increased the number of armed guards and now there are thousands. We are not threatening any other party, but the Kurds look out for the Kurds, the Arabs for the Arabs, so we have to protect ourselves too."

But Aghajan's ambitions go further. He is convinced that the only way to secure protection in the longer term is for an autonomous region, a safe haven, to be established covering Nineveh's Christians, as well as smaller minority communities there such as the Yezidis and the Shabak. "This special region would help us to maintain Christian history in that place. In that way, there would be no way for Kurds or Arabs to intervene. This would encourage the Christians living outside to come back, and it would be an example in the Middle East."

Aghajan is also sure that such an autonomous region should be part of an enlarged Kurdistan, prompting some politicians from Nineveh to accuse him of serving a Kurdish agenda. One, who fears the prospect of Kurdish control as much as a return by the Ba'athists, described him as "prime minister Barzani's loyal Christian". But Aghajan insists that the Nineveh plains would "get a fairer share" from the Kurdistan administration than from the central government. He praised Barzani's leadership. But he also knows that many Christians are already voting with their feet for the relative safety of Kurdistan.

Then he decribed how his people had been betrayed. "It was easy for the Americans and the British to have supported us when the churches were bombed - it was a historic opportunity - but they did nothing. If they had supported us financially, for example, we could have protected all the Christian families in Mosul."

Asked if he thought the Americans might be afraid to be seen to support the Christians, because that might be perceived as partisan or anti-Muslim, he waved his arm impatiently. "They didn't have to do it publicly - they could have done it through the Kurdistan Regional Government or through individuals. Now the Christians in Mosul are being made to change their religion. They are forced to pay money for jihad. If you hear the stories of those people, you will understand the tragedy. I am not talking about one of two families, or even a thousand, but about a nation.

"If our friends don't help us now, their friendship will be worth nothing in future. If it continues as it has, Baghdad and Mosul will be emptied of Christians."

As he spoke, I recalled Bush's words, over three years ago, from the decks of the USS Abraham Lincoln, announcing "the end of major combat operations" in Iraq. The president is fond of using biblical quotations in his speeches and he ended this one with a stirring message from the prophet Isaiah: "To the captives, 'Come out!' and to those in darkness, 'Be free!'"

In May, Iraq's first full-term government since the fall of Saddam Hussein was approved in Baghdad. Wijdan Mikha'il, a town planner and member of the secular Iraqi National List, was appointed as the new minister of human rights - a hard job, she remarked to me ruefully, in a country where "the people hardly have any rights". Mikha'il is also a Christian, the only one in the government. When she got the job, she moved her family, including her three young boys, from their spacious Baghdad house to live in a hotel behind the concrete blast walls of the Green Zone. Over supper there one evening she talked to me about the sectarianism that has poisoned Iraqi society.

"I have always seen myself as an Iraqi first, and then a Christian. Before, we all lived together, we never thought that someone was a Sunni and the other was a Shia, or a Christian, but now it is different." She has held discussions with the Iraqi Council of Minorities, a new umbrella group that is pushing for amendments to the constitution to improve human rights protection. When I asked Mikha'il about how many Christians were leaving, she said: "The process started before the war but it has accelerated. In the schools the children now say that a Christian is a kaffir, that he is different from the Muslims. And that means he can be treated differently. In 20 years there will be no more Christians in Iraq."

As she talked, two men and two women, dressed mainly in black, walked into the hotel restaurant and sat down in a corner. The minister lowered her voice: "They are Saddam's witnesses." The trial of Saddam Hussein was in session that week, stumbling from one adjournment to the next, and Mikha'il listed some of the atrocities for which the former dictator should still be tried, including the genocidal Anfal campaign against the Kurds, in which many Christians were also killed.

So was it worse before, or now, from the point of view of the Christian community? She replied immediately: "It's worse now. Not just for my community - for all Iraqis. Of course, what is happening now, Saddam partly created. We have gone in one year to a situation we would have reached after 15 years if Saddam was still in power: the lack of security, the breakdown of society . . ." Suddenly she laughed, for the first time that evening. "So maybe it is better to get there in one year, so we can start the process of improvement."

Would she herself still be here in 20 years' time? This time she hesitated. "I don't think so. I love Iraq. I had so many opportunities to leave, but I always stayed. But I don't want my children to live here"

I am convince that we are indeed living in the last stage of human history. The world is more aware of Christianity. Though more and more have heard of the Gospel, the hatred towards Christianity is increasing. The world belief and the Church belief contradicts. I believe the day will come when the world will not tolerate the teaching of Christianity and wanted to ban the bible. As more and more people of other tribes and tongues have heard and believe in the Truth, falsehood screams louder and louder. Wait and see. Truth will always endure.

Rate This Post

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Lamentation

I am born with a pentium II processor and a ram of 256MB. The society wants me to overclock to fit into their demands. I overclock and seems to become a pentium 4 processor but the ram remains. Now the society requires us to become pentium 6 whereby the maximum I can overclock is pentium 4. My CPU is burning hot. Good for those who managed to overclock to pentium 6.

Perhaps I could comfort myself with a church song. The title I forget but there is a line but never forget: 。。。。。 感谢上帝玫瑰有刺 。。。。。 Maybe that is why God makes me so imperfect. (Those who don't understand can try approaching me.)

Haiz... the higher I go up, the thinner the air is. How far up do we need to go before we can't even grasp for air?

I am tired of this society and the world. I am sick of their ever-changing policy; errors and mistakes made because of the sinful nature - especially pride.

I am so sick sometimes I feel that to be non-existent is better than struggling in this world. But on second thoughts, I have not found the rib that God took it from me. Perhaps God really did not take it?

Sometimes I feel frustrated at waiting for Him to come back and restore everything. I know I have no choice because it is God's will. I know He will come back but the waiting part is really not easy to endure. Sometimes the devil would tempt me with the fruit and I give in. Sometimes I shout to the devil "GET LOST!". The struggle for following the Truth really has a price to pay. I could rather join the world and lost myself in this fallen world - if only God is dead. I believe otherwise.

The world is indeed degenerating. I believe everybody who still desire to do good and response to their conscience would feel it. How long and far can God tolerate the world? I don't know. The bible tells us that this generation will become like the days of Noah. How corrupted were the days of Noah I don't know. One thing I know is that we are slowly if not accelerating towards this state.

I can't understand God's way of doing things. Some says He is dead. However, there are stronger reasons to believe otherwise.

To all who still want to listen: Grasp to the faith and the truth when the wave of evil is marching in.

Rate This Post